Sat, 01/28/2012 - 08:59 — Anonymous This is a favorite, much-kicked-around
topic of mine, as relevant to travel writers as to more stationary
memoirists. Earlier this week the folks at The Rumpus added a fresh
contribution to the debate. Messing With Memoir is an essay about the
author's efforts to revise her out-of-print memoir, years after she'd
written it, and the ethical issues she grappled with in doing so. Here's a
taste: I was a much better writer now. Why let that raw, earnest,
adverb-friendly, long-sentenced version of myself linger? With e-books and
Print on Demand (POD) as a garrote, I could quietly, efficiently off her. In
her place I would seat that wiser, more skilled self. But was it ethical? I
had never heard of anyone tampering with their memoir. A memoir is not only
an account of your life, it is specifically an account of your /remembrances/
of your life. So now I would be telling that same story fifteen years later.
I was re-remembering a memory. Even more important, a memoir is a reflection
of who you are at the time of writing. But now I would be peering backwards
at myself from a new vantage point. Isn't there a different author (older,
wiser me) now? And haven't I now changed my main character by writing her
with this new hand? Did this matter? Touching on the same theme in one of his
"Daily Rumpus" emails a few days back, editor Stephen Elliott wrote about
"the only true rule of memoir": You cannot knowingly tell a lie. In other
words, you can be wrong, you can write things you consider to be true that
other people consider to be untrue. In fact, it's impossible to do
otherwise. Most truth is not factual; most truth is subjective. But to state
a something as fact when you know it is not, ie. I spent this much time in
jail, is to break the cardinal rule. I think that gets it about right. For
more, check out Tom Bissell's essay on truth and travel literature, Truth
in Oxiana. World Hum
No comments:
Post a Comment